sábado, 15 de octubre de 2022

oxytocin and the female friend

Temple of Mut
Shrine of Flaming Capitalism

Oxytocin: The Most Toxic Compound to the Female Brain
Dear Readers: I have a good friend whose daughter has reached an age when thoughts of young men with round, strong arms fill the head. So, based on his concerns, I wanted to update one of my favorite posts involving biochemistry.

Additionally, my good friend Captain Capitalism recently noted: Too Close to the Truth?

Feminism has been around far longer than game. I’ll tell you what, game works best on feminists, girls so assured of themselves and filled with fake confidence based on their education and careers that they never see it coming. Most feminists honestly believe that game doesn’t exist or would never work on someone like them.

Captain Capitalism and I don’t disagree much — and here we are in complete agreement. He takes a sociological approach to the matter. I, on the other, am going the pure science route. Here is the compound responsible for the above-stated truth:

As a truly independent-minded woman with a science background, the tenet of feminist propaganda’s “you can have it all” approach that galls me most is:

Women can “hook-up” exactly like men and suffer no emotional consequences.

Today, I am going to delve into the chemistry-based realities showing that this canon is a complete lie. Before I begin, I would like to note that I am not addressing the morality and theology related to the benefits of a “just say no” approach. I am sticking strictly to biochemical reactions.

Birth control and abortion options, which have expanded considerably in the past 40 years and hailed by feminists as emancipating women, seem to give both sexes the mistaken notion that they can have brief sexual encounters with serial partners and face no consequences that can’t be handled by a visit to a clinic.

For men, that remains somewhat true — or as true as it has been throughout history. However, for women, that remains as untrue today as it has been since Eve (for “intelligent designers”) or Lucy (for Darwinian evolutionists). The reason is oxytocin.

“Love is the drug” and oxytocin is that compound! When pumped into the bloodstream, oxytocin acts as a “neuromodulator,” giving people the warm-and-fuzzies and increasing the emotional bond between that person and the second individual (whose presence is stimulating the production of this hormone). One article lists 10 REASONS WHY OXYTOCIN IS THE MOST AMAZING MOLECULE IN THE WORLD. Chief among these reasons:

Often referred to as the “love molecule”, oxytocin is typically associated with helping couples establish a greater sense of intimacy and attachment. Oxytocin, along with dopamine and norepinephrine, are believed to be highly critical in human pair-bonding. But not only that, it also increases the desire for couples to gaze at one another, it creates sexual arousal, and it helps males maintain their erections. When you’re sexually aroused or excited, oxytocin levels increase in your brain significantly — a primary factor for bringing about an orgasm. And during the orgasm itself, the brain is flooded with oxytocin — a possible explanation for why (some) couples like to cuddle after.

Its power is not to be underestimated.

During millions of years of human evolution, the female system has been designed to begin a cascade of oxytocin production during two specific events: 1) When being intimate with a male; 2) When breast-feeding an infant. On the other hand, human males have very limited oxytocin levels (and actually release some of the little oxytocin they produce when “involved” with the woman of the moment).

Now, oxytocin is a wonderful thing. It energizes people, and makes them feel good about life. It enhances the immune system, as well as boosts other biochemical processes in the human body. Personally, after strawberry margaritas, oxytocin is my favorite chemical (and I have a graduate degree in chemistry, so I know chemicals).

However, as with everything else pleasurable in life, there can be a bit of a downside. Once a woman generates oxytocin, she will usually want to do everything in her power to keep up the production levels. For example, there are tales of women who nurse their babies past toddler-hood (until 3, 4 or 5 years in age). This is related to the fact these women want to continue releasing oxytocin (even though they will have other rationalizations).

The same thing is true following intimate relations. Oxytocin production can be stimulated in a woman through her lover’s voice, scent, sight and touch. This fact explains a wide range of female behaviors that follow intimacy. For example, women will call up their new partner frequently. They will steal their lover’s shirts to enjoy the scent. They will invent excuses to see the man-of-the moment. And the more oxytocin these women generate when with their lovers (or by talking to them), the more emotionally attached they get.

A few points to bear in mind, so that the role of oxytocin in human dynamics can be fully appreciated:

Though men do generate oxytocin, they don’t match the production levels in women.
Men can release small amounts of oxytocin into a woman (increasing her “rush”), thereby creating more of a bond between them.
Women will generate fairly substantial amounts the first time they are intimate with anyone (therefore, the biochemical basis for the focus on virginity), and increasing all the affects I have previously described.
These aspects are not necessarily bad, especially if a woman is involved with a nice man and is in a committed relationship. However, it can really complicate life if those conditions are not met. And, the bad thing about it is, the presence/voice of a lover or former beau can trigger oxytocin production in an affected female for up to 2 YEARS!!!!!!!

Basically, to guarantee a man will no longer have an affect on a woman, she can never hear/see/touch the man in question for up to two years. Fortunately, once the gentleman is “out of her system”, that same individual tends not to trigger such production again.

Ever wonder why woman goes back to a man who beats and abuses her? Or question why supposedly smart women can’t make up their mind whether to dump boyfriends that impregnate someone else? How about ex-girlfriends who call endlessly? Then, there is the scary extreme of stalkers.

Whatever relationship path women travel, unlike “gender feminists”, I want my female compatriots to make fully informed decisions. I hope that they consider the information I have given and avoid mistakes that result in needless pain, heartache, life-altering consequences, and the following award:

Thirty years of birth control and abortion cannot get around this basic biochemistry, designed to create strong bonds between a female and her provider (the male) and offspring (her children). To think otherwise is arrogance and/or stupidity.

No, women cannot “hook-up” like men. 

Dr. Bruno B. Averbeck’s recent research confirms clearly that a powerful neuro-transmitter like oxytocin has dramatic effects on high-level human behavior.

An intense biochemical bond is formed when women are intimate with men. To break that bond is exceedingly difficult, and places women in the position of having to quench a biochemical reaction, and in doing so, causing both physical and emotional stress that is unnecessary and unhealthy. Casual sex is devastating to women in so many different ways, and to pretend that women can have serial sex with many partners and not be physically and emotionally diminished by this is foolish.

I would like to commend noted lecturer, Dr. Patricia Allen, whose talk inspired my investigation into this topic many years ago. For those of you who are interested, I recommend the following video: No.1 Mistake Women Make With Men.

Millions of Years of Biology vs 50-years of Feminist Dogma — THE CHOICE IS YOURS!
Share this:
WORTHLESS CRUSADERISM: Targets of Captain Capitalism’s Valiant Fight
August 19, 2012

Now That’s Blaming Men for a Bit Too Much!
June 14, 2013
In "Biochemistry"

Canto Talk Valentine’s Day with Captain Capitalism
February 10, 2019
In "Camelot"

September 23, 201213 Replies
« Previous
Next »
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment * 

Name *

Email *


 Notify me of new comments via email.

 Notify me of new posts via email.

nooneofanyimport on September 23, 2012 at 9:17 pm
Fascinating. Isn’t it also what docs use to induce labor?

mutnodjmet13 on September 23, 2012 at 9:24 pm
Yes. I think pitocin is more common.

nooneofanyimport on September 24, 2012 at 1:32 am
ahh! pitocin. Guess it’s obvious I’m no sciencetician like you 😉

doodooecon on September 24, 2012 at 12:30 am
Well done Godess, society can only hope young women listen. The impact upon young men of a societal story that women have serial sex partners, absolves the young men of responsibility and respect.

edge of the sandbox on September 24, 2012 at 4:39 am
Great post. I’m going to link to it in coming days.

mutnodjmet13 on September 24, 2012 at 2:21 pm
Edge! Thanks so much, as I really would like to get this information out to young people who can use it.

desahra on September 24, 2012 at 8:31 pm
I think I’m going to end up doing a lot of work in this field. I hope to scientically show that women can become situationally habituated to oxytocin’s bonding effects within the framework of sex with men, thereby being unable to respond to it and therefore less (or un-) able to bond with men in sexual relationships.

mutnodjmet13 on September 24, 2012 at 8:35 pm
I sense that your theory is likely to prove true. If you publish anything in this subject, let me know and I would like to share it. Thanks for stopping by!

barrycjacobsen on November 8, 2012 at 1:58 am
Love it!

Pingback: You obviously need a sex scandal for the American Press to cover a story! « Temple of Mut

rob fitz on January 10, 2013 at 8:07 am
if you could relieve some of the O molecules from N molecules in the lower potion of the structure maybe with a metal or carbon and less hyper gas molecule….oxytocin is just a gas or what my brother said was sniffing

Sophie on April 28, 2013 at 9:33 pm
Was the movie removed? I just tried watching and youtube told me it doesn’t exist.

wjrevere on May 21, 2017 at 1:54 pm
Well done. Good article.

HISTORY BYTES – PODCAST PROGRAM HISTORY BYTES Podcast show reviewing how the past impacts the present. Hosted by Barry Jacobsen and Leslie Eastman
Little LogoHISTORY BYTES - FACEBOOK with Barry Jacobsen & Leslie Eastman
Twitter Header small@HistoryBytes - TWITTER

An amateur Egyptologist who sometimes writes about Egypt. Proud member of the SLOBs (San Diego Local Order of Bloggers).


Recent Posts
Canto Talk, June 3rd: California politics with Leslie Eastman & Barry Jacobsen
Canto Talk, December 16th: Annual Christmas Show
Canto Talk, Oct. 21st: Fall Festival of News Edition
Canto Talk, August 12 at 7 pm: Tall Texas Tales
Canto Talk, July 28 at 7 pm: Recall Summer in California Continues
Temple of Mut
Egypt, Tea Party, Capitalism
Follow my blog
RSS MUT’s Word of the Day
RT @awstar11: At least now they'll have two female journalists to blame if Fetterman loses. 2 hours ago
RT @awstar11: We can all see what you're doing. You're changing your story after the fact once it was clear that you reported the truth by… 2 hours ago
Another pathetic moment in #Biden presidency. Looking forward to the day when #nuclear is not a trending topic in…… 2 hours ago
RT @CicadaStanley: @AP4Liberty In order to defeat oil, one must be oil. 2 hours ago
RT @AP4Liberty: 2 hours ago
Select Category
View Full Site